Thank you for agreeing to review for GDPMR. Your expertise and commitment help ensure the integrity and quality of the content we publish. Please follow these guidelines to maintain our high standards.

Confidentiality

1. The review process is strictly confidential. Do not share or discuss the manuscript or your review with anyone outside of the editorial team unless authorized.
2. Avoid using or citing any information from the manuscript in your own research until it is published.

1. Decline the review if you have any personal, professional, or financial conflicts of interest with the authors or the subject matter of the manuscript.
2. If you are unsure about a potential conflict, please inform the editorial office for clarification.

1. Aim to submit your review within the agreed-upon timeframe (typically 2–4 weeks). If an extension is needed, inform the editorial office as soon as possible.
2. Timely reviews help ensure a smooth editorial process and benefit both the authors and the journal.

1. Ensure that the manuscript fits within the scope of GDPMR and contributes to the fields of social sciences.
2. Comment on the relevance, originality, and potential impact of the research.

Your review should include the following elements:

1. Summary of the Paper
   Provide a concise summary of the manuscript, highlighting the research objectives, methods, and conclusions. This helps authors know if their key points are clearly conveyed.

2. Major Comments
   Identify any significant issues regarding:

   1. Research Design: Comment on the appropriateness of the methodology and whether it supports the research objectives.
   2. Data & Analysis: Assess the quality and sufficiency of the data and the rigor of the analysis.
   3. Findings & Conclusions: Evaluate whether the conclusions are well-supported by the data.
   4. Originality & Contribution: Comment on the novelty and contribution of the research to the field.

3. Minor Comments

   1. Suggest improvements in writing clarity, structure, or formatting.
   2. Point out inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or areas needing more explanation.

4. Recommendation
   Based on your assessment, provide a recommendation:

   1. Accept as is
   2. Minor revisions
   3. Major revisions
   4. Reject

1. Comment on the clarity, organization, and readability of the manuscript. Authors may be experts in their field but could need help refining their writing.
2. If the language is significantly unclear or ungrammatical, suggest professional language editing.

GDPMR has a strict plagiarism policy with a threshold of 10 percent similarity. If you notice high levels of overlap or any unethical practices, notify the editorial team immediately.

GDPMR follows a double-blind peer review process. Please do not disclose your identity to the authors or include any self-identifying information in your review.

1. Provide clear, specific, and constructive feedback aimed at improving the manuscript.
2. Be respectful and professional in your tone. Harsh or dismissive language is discouraged.

In case of major revisions, you may be invited to review the revised manuscript. Please ensure that the authors have adequately addressed your comments and suggestions.