Abstract
This research paper explores the growing utilization of social media by politicians, political entities, and governmental bodies as a means to connect with their constituents and exert influence on public sentiment. Although social media offers benefits like increased political engagement and direct communication, it also introduces concerns regarding the propagation of false information, hate speech, and manipulative content. The dissemination of inaccurate data and prejudiced narratives through social media has contributed to polarization and a lack of trust within political conversations. To tackle these challenges, the article proposes the adoption of effective strategies, such as promoting media literacy, backing fact-checking initiatives, fostering inclusivity of diverse perspectives, and holding social media platforms accountable. By collaborating, regulatory bodies and social media companies can work toward ensuring that social media continues to play a constructive role in shaping democratic processes.
Key Words
Social Media, Fake Narrative, Politics
Introduction
The escalating adoption of social media platforms such as Twitter (Currently known as X.com), Facebook, and Instagram by politicians, political parties, and governments highlights their role in connecting with constituents and shaping public opinion. Nevertheless, the integration of social media into the realm of politics raises concerns about the proliferation of disinformation, manipulation, and hate speech. This essay delves into the significance of social media in shaping political discourse and propaganda, as well as the associated advantages and risks of its utilization within politics. Undoubtedly, social media has revolutionized political participation by affording individuals a platform for self-expression, fostering community building, and enabling swift communication. However, these platforms have also become tools for the dissemination of false information and propaganda, adversely impacting the quality of political discussions (Goswami, 2018). The propagation of deceptive news articles, conspiracy theories, and skewed narratives through social media has contributed to the fragmentation, erosion of trust, and deterioration of civic conversations. Furthermore, algorithms often prioritize sensational or contentious content, exacerbating this issue. On the flip side, social media has empowered marginalized voices, facilitating direct interaction between individuals and elected officials and nurturing grassroots movements. (Noor Ul Amin, 2023) To counterbalance the negative repercussions of social media on political discourse, initiatives should be undertaken to enhance media literacy, counter disinformation through independent fact-checking initiatives, and promote transparency and accountability within social media corporations. Through these actions, we can harness the potential benefits of social media while mitigating its detrimental impacts on democratic processes.
Social media was initially hailed as a democratizing force because it has revolutionized the way citizens engage with democracy and empowered marginalized groups to express their voices. However, this narrative has evolved as influential actors, including governments and state institutions, have entered the digital realm to disseminate information and influence public discourse. While it's positive to witness government officials using online platforms to connect with citizens, engage in dialogue, and defend policies, this shift has also brought about unintended consequences. The once-unified digital landscape has now become a battleground of polarized political discussions, where oppressed minority groups often find their voices suppressed and the concept of 'fake news' has been weaponized against independent journalism that challenges the official narrative (Preslav Nakov, 2021). The proliferation of disinformation, which involves the spread of false information with the intention to deceive, has become increasingly sophisticated within the realm of social media. In fact, nation-states have emerged as prominent actors in the propagation of disinformation. The revelations from the Cambridge Analytic scandal exposed the sale of users' data to public relations agencies through third-party apps, which was then exploited to manipulate voter behaviour during the 2016 US election (Noor Ul Amin, 2023).
The trajectory of social media's impact on democracy has shifted from a platform for empowerment to a space where complex dynamics of power, polarization, and disinformation intersect. As this landscape continues to evolve, addressing the challenges posed by the manipulation of digital platforms remains a critical task for safeguarding the integrity of democratic discourse (Muzaffar, 2019).
The Transformative Impact of Social Media on Political Dialogue
The landscape of political discourse has undergone a substantial shift due to the pervasive influence of social media, reshaping interactions and engagements among politicians, governments, and individuals. A paramount way in which social media has reshaped political discourse is by amplifying the voices of marginalized perspectives. Previously unheard groups have found a platform through social media, enabling them to highlight crucial issues and expand the range of viewpoints. This infusion of diversity has promoted inclusivity and enriched political conversations by representing a broader array of stances. Nonetheless, social media has introduced new challenges to political discourse. The rapid dissemination of misinformation and disinformation, easily propagated through these platforms, remains a formidable hurdle. Conspiracies, fabricated news, and propaganda have proliferated, eroding the foundation of evidence-based political discussions (Sumera Batool, 2019).
Additionally, social media algorithms often reinforce content aligned with users' existing beliefs, fostering echo chambers that intensify partisan divisions and polarize political dialogues. In spite of these hurdles, social media maintains its effectiveness as a tool for political engagement and activism. It has empowered citizens to directly communicate with politicians and governmental bodies, fostering a sense of involvement and ownership in the political arena. Social media has also revolutionized the landscape of political campaigns, enabling politicians to reach a wider audience and directly engage with voters. Yet, as the influence of social media on political discourse continues to expand, it is imperative to confront its challenges and ensure that technology upholds the values of democracy and collective welfare (Sharif, 2022).
The Evolution of Political Propaganda and Challenges
Political propaganda has undergone a transformative shift, emerging as a potent tool for shaping public perceptions and influencing political decisions. Enabled by technological advancements, propagandists now harness diverse communication channels, encompassing social media, print and broadcast media, direct mailings, and more. This digital age has facilitated rapid and targeted dissemination of narratives tailored to specific demographics. This capability to sway individual perspectives and actions has profound implications, fueling the polarization of political discourse and eroding trust in institutional authorities (Zaeem Yasin, 2022). Furthermore, the adoption of propaganda tactics poses a grave threat to the credibility of democratic processes, paving the way for election manipulation and curbing minority rights.
To mitigate these risks, concerted efforts among academics, policymakers, and civil society entities are essential. Collaborative actions are needed to enhance transparency and accountability within political advertising, strengthen media literacy education, and safeguard the integrity of democratic mechanisms through robust election security measures. Safeguarding democratic values and preserving an informed public sphere demand a comprehensive approach to combat the proliferation of political propaganda. This involves recognizing the dangers posed by propaganda, taking steps to mitigate its detrimental effects, and upholding the principles of free speech and open expression. Ultimately, nurturing an informed and engaged citizenry remains paramount for upholding a thriving democracy, achievable through a steadfast commitment to transparency, accountability, and democratic norms of governance. (Sumera Batool, 2019)
Navigating the Impact of Social Media on Political Engagement:
The way of social media in political engagement has been monumental, presenting a dual landscape of opportunities and challenges. On one hand, these platforms offer an unprecedented avenue for political mobilization, facilitating the emergence of grassroots movements and the dissemination of political information. Hashtag campaigns, online petitions, and virtual rallies have become common features of contemporary political discourse. Leveraging social media, individuals connect with like-minded peers, fostering a shared purpose that galvanizes political activism. However, the realm of social media also introduces a series of complexities to political engagement. (Muzaffar, 2019)A pivotal concern lies in the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation, significantly impacting political decision-making. The spread of fabricated news, propaganda, and manipulated media can mislead individuals, impeding their ability to make informed judgments. Furthermore, social media algorithms, driven by user behaviour can curate personalized content feeds, potentially constraining exposure to diverse perspectives and reinforcing existing beliefs. Another pressing issue involves the exploitation of personal data for political agendas. The prioritization of data collection by social media entities over user privacy raises apprehensions about the targeted use of personal information for political advertising, potentially reinforcing biases and distorting public opinion. As reliance on social media for political information and engagement grows, there's a risk of diminishing traditional forms of political participation, like voting and civic involvement. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure that social media becomes an enabler rather than an impediment to political participation. Enhanced regulation of social media platforms, augmented investment in media literacy education, and a renewed appreciation for the significance of conventional political engagement methods can foster positive change. By acknowledging the potential pitfalls of social media and proactively undertaking measures to mitigate them, we can harness its potential to bolster democratic institutions and drive constructive progress. (Taufiq Ahmad, 2019)
Social media has ushered in a paradigm shift in the realm of politics, delivering a multitude of advantages to politicians, governments, and individuals alike. This digital landscape has revolutionized political interaction and engagement, providing avenues for real-time communication, mobilization, and invaluable feedback. A standout advantage of social media in the political arena lies in its potential to bolster transparency and accountability. Politicians and government officials can directly engage with the public via these platforms, affording unprecedented insights into their activities and policies. This transparency fosters trust and confidence as citizens witness the actions and performance of their leaders, fostering an environment of openness (Muhammad Umair Chaudhary, 2020). Furthermore, social media empowers voters to hold elected representatives accountable for their commitments and deeds, ensuring that those in positions of authority remain responsive to the demands of the people. The inclusivity of social media extends its impact on the political process. Through online polls, surveys, and debates, individuals can voice their opinions and influence policy decisions. These platforms offer a level playing field, transcending socioeconomic backgrounds and enabling all voices to contribute. This nurtures a participatory democracy, wherein every individual plays a role in shaping their community and nation. Additionally, social media serves as a valuable source of feedback, capturing popular sentiments and preferences. By monitoring trends and dialogues on these platforms, politicians and governments can assess the efficacy of their initiatives and make necessary adjustments. Social media listening aids in identifying emerging issues, enabling leaders to proactively address them. This ensures policies align with the aspirations of the populace rather than catering solely to a select few (Olowo, 2018).
Lastly, social media has the potential to enhance political inclusivity and accessibility. Geographical barriers are bridged, enabling politicians and individuals from diverse backgrounds to collaborate and communicate. By offering entry points for marginalized populations, social media empowers those typically excluded from the political discourse. Moreover, it can facilitate unity between urban and rural communities, fostering a shared sense of purpose and solidarity. Embracing social media allows politicians and governments to tap into the diversity of their constituents, resulting in a more representative and inclusive democratic landscape. (Da?li, 2019)
Social Media's Dual Impact on Politics: Opportunities and Challenges
The profound influence of social media on the political landscape has introduced numerous advantages alongside significant concerns. The direct connectivity between politicians, individuals, and their audience fosters an unprecedented level of transparency and accountability. This direct interaction empowers citizens to express their opinions and exert influence over governmental decisions, contributing to a more participatory and inclusive democratic framework. Nevertheless, social media's capabilities also come with inherent drawbacks (Da?li, 2019). The propagation of misinformation and disinformation, distorting public perceptions and eroding trust in democratic institutions, constitutes a major concern. Additionally, social media platforms can perpetuate existing biases, leading to "filter bubbles" that reinforce party divisions and hinder efforts to establish common ground (Muzaffar, 2019).
The utilization of social media by political actors also brings forth privacy breaches and cyber threats, endangering sensitive information and undermining the integrity of democratic processes. Addressing the challenge of disinformation requires prioritizing media literacy and implementing robust fact-checking initiatives (Nirankush Dutta, 2016). Furthermore, strengthening data protection regulations can help prevent privacy breaches and cyber attacks. Social media platforms must also assume responsibility for monitoring their content and enforcing community guidelines to eliminate harmful or inappropriate information. A collaborative and cross-party approach can contribute to mitigating polarization and tribalism by fostering inclusive and respectful behaviour among political participants and promoting a culture of constructive discourse. Implementing robust cyber security measures is crucial to safeguard political actors from cyber threats and uphold the integrity of democratic proceedings. Ultimately, social media's transformative impact on politics underscores both opportunities and obstacles. By recognizing and addressing these challenges, political actors can harness the potential of social media to enhance democratic processes and enrich the lives of citizens. (Sharif, 2022)
The Rise of Misinformation Campaigns in Modern State Conflicts:
In contemporary conflicts between states, the proliferation of fake news has emerged as a significant factor. Numerous countries are utilizing disinformation campaigns to sway and reshape public opinion both domestically and internationally. While such campaigns are relatively recent, the RAND Corporation, a renowned global policy think tank, reveals that several countries have employed these tactics to advance specific narratives, often targeting foreign adversaries. These misleading campaigns, disseminating unverified information across social media, have achieved operational successes, yet their overall impact remains uncertain. Nonetheless, experts caution that the spread of misinformation is likely to intensify in the coming decade (Kumar, 2016).
Termed a powerful information warfare tool, the utilization of misleading campaigns is a hallmark of totalitarianism, manipulating information to control perceptions. Dr. Melissa Beattie, Assistant Professor of English and Communications at the American University of Armenia, asserts that misinformation without media literacy or critical thinking skills can mislead individuals and shape their actions based on false information (Noor Ul Amin, 2023). Furthermore, misinformation poses a double-edged sword: for those who are aware of it, critical thinking skills determine their response. However, misinformation undermines discourse, reinforces negative perceptions, and perpetuates divisions. It's a complex issue that extends beyond borders, affecting international relations and narratives.
The “EU DisinfoLab” uncovered an organized network of fake Indian news domains with the objective of influencing global opinion against Pakistan. This extensive operation, orchestrated by the Srivastava Group, aimed to shape perceptions in favour of India while discrediting Pakistan on numerous issues. The network employed an array of tactics, including fake news sites, resurrecting defunct media outlets, and exploiting trending hashtags. (Taufiq Ahmad, 2019)
Figure 1
source: Expresstribune.com
Misinformation's impact reaches far beyond public opinion, as it often targets key events like Financial Action Task Force meetings. This misinformation strategy can create tension between countries, yet expert analysis reveals its often absurd and unconvincing nature. Social media, as a powerful platform, amplifies fake news, taking advantage of tech-savvy and nationalistic populations. While the fake news cycle fuels tensions, the responses vary from strict denials to dismissive laughter. In this environment, misinformation is not just a passive element—it serves as a dynamic and often strategic weapon that shapes perceptions, strengthens biases and undermines efforts for mutual understanding (Hashmi, 2022). Ultimately, it's a challenge that demands proactive measures to enhance media literacy, encourage critical thinking, and establish a responsible media landscape that respects truth and accuracy.
The Evolution of Social Media: Balancing Benefits and Concerns
The advent of social media platforms like
Facebook, Twitter( currently known as X.com), and Instagram have revolutionized how we interact, share information, and engage with our surroundings. While offering convenience in communication and idea sharing, this phenomenon also ushers in new challenges, such as the propagation of misinformation and the erosion of privacy. This article delves into an exploration of the advantages and disadvantages of social media and its broader impact on society. On the positive side, social media brings forth several benefits. It serves as a virtual bridge connecting individuals with shared interests and backgrounds, regardless of geographical boundaries, thereby fostering a sense of community and belonging. Moreover, it amplifies the voices of marginalized individuals, enabling them to spotlight critical social issues. (Sharif, 2022)In addition, social media acts as a catalyst for activism and advocacy, empowering users to mobilize for change. (Hashmi, 2022)
Conversely, there are drawbacks associated with social media. Foremost among them is the proliferation of disinformation, which can have dire societal consequences. Falsehoods spread rapidly across social media platforms, often lacking proper verification or context, and correcting the narrative becomes a challenging endeavour once it gains momentum. This can lead to confusion, distrust, and even incite violence. Additionally, as individuals increasingly seek validation through likes and follow, social media may foster addiction and pose risks to mental well-being. Furthermore, the practice of data collection and sale by social media companies raises concerns about privacy infringement and surveillance. Despite these challenges, there are measures that can mitigate the downsides while enhancing the advantages of social media. Platforms can implement stringent fact-checking protocols and improve transparency in data handling. Users, on their part, can adopt responsible practices such as monitoring screen time and configuring privacy settings to safeguard their personal information and mental health. Ultimately, the onus lies on each individual to engage with social media in an ethical and conscientious manner, contributing to the creation of a secure and equitable online environment. (Sumera Batool, 2019)
The Transformation of Political Engagement: Leveraging Social Media Ethically and Effectively
The landscape of political interaction has undergone a significant shift due to the influence of social media. Politicians now have the opportunity to connect with their constituents and rally support for their initiatives in novel ways. By consistently sharing genuine content, politicians can craft a unique brand identity that garners the trust and confidence of their audience. Additionally, leveraging data insights from social media platforms allows politicians to tailor their messages for maximum engagement, effectively catering to the preferences and viewpoints of their constituents. Another notable advantage of integrating social media into politics is the direct line of communication it establishes with voters (Strandberg, 2015). Demonstrating a commitment to public input, politicians can promptly and intelligently respond to comments, messages, and mentions, showcasing their responsiveness to citizen concerns. Leveraging impactful visual elements such as videos and images adds another dimension to political communication, effectively capturing the attention of viewers and conveying crucial ideas. (Olowo, 2018)
However, the integration of social media into politics must also navigate ethical considerations. Responsible utilization of these platforms necessitates transparency, including disclosure of funding sources to maintain integrity. (Muzaffar, 2019) Politicians must refrain from employing manipulative tactics and methods, upholding the principles of honesty and fairness. Moreover, safeguarding individual privacy rights is of paramount importance, respecting the boundaries of personal information. By adhering to these ethical standards, politicians can effectively harness the power of social media to garner support, engage with their constituents, and advance their objectives in a manner that is both efficient and morally sound. (Nirankush Dutta, 2016)
Challenges of Regulating Social Media: Balancing Freedom and Responsibility:
The advent of social media has ushered in a myriad of complexities that regulators must grapple with. One significant challenge lies in the global reach of these platforms, as people from all corners of the world engage with them, making it difficult for authorities to enforce regulations across borders. Another hurdle involves defining and identifying harmful content, a task that varies based on context and cultural norms. What constitutes hate speech in one country might not be seen as such in another. The rapid dissemination of content on social media further compounds the challenge, as harmful information can spread swiftly, making detection and removal by authorities a daunting task. Striking the right balance between freedom of expression and curbing harmful content poses yet another conundrum (Hashmi, 2022).
Despite these hurdles, regulators have a range of strategies to manage the impact of social media. Collaborating with social media companies to establish and enforce their own terms of service is one approach, that allows them to proactively remove damaging content from their platforms. Another avenue is the enactment of legislation specifically addressing harmful material on social media, bolstering regulators' ability to hold platforms accountable for content displayed. (Olowo, 2018) Additionally, investing in research focused on the societal effects of social media can provide valuable insights, aiding regulators in understanding the complexities and potential of these platforms. (Sumera Batool, 2019)
In addition to the aforementioned challenges, an array of ethical considerations comes into play when governing social media. Safeguarding user privacy and avoiding undue censorship is paramount, requiring careful deliberation by authorities. Moreover, the potential impact of regulations on democratic processes and the right to free speech cannot be ignored. Striking the right balance between user protection and preserving the positive aspects of social media is crucial. While the conversation surrounding social media regulation may endure for years, it is imperative to initiate this discourse promptly. By doing so, we can establish thoughtful policies that safeguard users while harnessing the vast potential of social media for the greater good.
Constructive and Progressive Implementation of Social Media
The emergence of social media has brought about a paradigm shift in how politicians engage with constituents and shape public opinion. While it presents numerous advantages such as extended reach, personalized interaction, and instant feedback, it also raises significant concerns like the propagation of misinformation, hate speech, and manipulation. To effectively address these challenges, politicians, political entities, and social media platforms must adopt a set of best practices that encourage transparency, fact verification, responsible moderation, and necessary regulation. (Taufiq Ahmad, 2019)By doing so, we can harness the potential of social media to strengthen democratic processes rather than undermine them.
Social media's influence on political discourse and propaganda is noteworthy. It has revolutionized communication, offering individuals a platform to voice their opinions and enabling political players to disseminate their messages more widely. This dual impact has brought both favourable and unfavourable consequences. On one hand, it has democratized political engagement, empowering citizens to participate actively and challenge conventional power structures. Conversely, it has amplified the spread of fabricated content and propaganda, leveraging platforms' algorithms that prioritize sensationalism over accuracy, thereby blurring the line between reality and fiction (Da?li, 2019). This proliferation of political propaganda has deepened divisions and hindered productive political discourse, making it harder to tackle critical societal issues.
To mitigate the risks posed by social media to political dialogue, several best practices should be established:
? Promoting Critical Thinking and Media Literacy: Equipping individuals with the ability to critically assess information on social media and recognize manipulation tactics is crucial.
? Supporting Fact-Checking Organizations: Strengthening and endorsing fact-checking initiatives can counter the spread of false claims and provide accurate information to the public.
? Encouraging Diversity of Voices: Designing social media platforms to elevate a range of perspectives ensures a balanced representation of viewpoints, irrespective of their popularity.
? Holding Social Media Companies Accountable: Social media platforms must take responsibility for content hosted, removing harmful elements and maintaining transparency in their approach towards combating misinformation.
The task of regulating social media is indeed complex, but it is imperative to rise to the challenge. While social media has the potential to be a force for positive change, its misuse can lead to harm (Kumar, 2016). By collaborating with social media companies, regulators can help establish an environment where social media remains a constructive and secure space for all individuals to engage in meaningful discourse.
Conclusion
In summary, the impact of social media on political discourse and propaganda cannot be understated. It has revolutionized communication and information dissemination, shaping a range of outcomes in the political landscape. While offering valuable advantages, it also introduces certain challenges that need to be addressed. By establishing and adhering to best practices when employing social media in politics, we can mitigate its potential risks and harness its benefits for constructive engagement. Through collaborative efforts, we can work towards leveraging social media as a force for positive change and responsible political dialogue.
References
- Daşli, Y. (2019). Use of social media as a tool for political communication in the field of politics. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 243–251.
- Goswami, M. P. (2018). Fake News and Cyber Propaganda: A Study of Manipulation and Abuses on Social Media. Kanishka Publisher, 535-544
- Hashmi, W. F. (2022). Viewpoint: Social media and its effects. Dawn.com:
- Kumar, A. (2016). Role of Social Media in Political Campaigning and its Evaluation Methodology: A Review. 2016.
- Muhammad Umair Chaudhary, S. M. (2020). Social Media a Tool of Political Awareness and Mobilization -A Study of Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1331- 1345.
- Muzaffar, M. (2019). Social Media and Political Awareness in Pakistan: A Case Study of Youth. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 3(II), 141–153.
- Nirankush Dutta, A. K. (2016). Use of Social Media for Political Engagement: A Literature Review. Birla Institute of Technology & Science (BITS), 517-523.
- Noor Ul Amin, B. N. (2023). Media and Hybrid War: Political Influence and Disinformation. Journal of Education & Humanities Research (JEHR), 57-64.
- Olowo, E. O. (2018). Role of Social Networking and Media in Political Awareness in Public. Journal of Mobile Computing & Application, 06-10.
- Preslav Nakov, G. D. (2021). Fake News, Disinformation, Propaganda, and Media Bias. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, (pp. 4862– 4865).
- Sharif, M. M. (2022). The state and the menace of social media. Express Tribune:
- Strandberg, G. (2015). Social Media Politics: Using the Internet to Get Elected. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
- Batool, S., Sultana, S., & Farrah-ul-Momineen. (2019). Analyzing the Role of Social Media in Strengthening Democracy in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(II), 391–402.
- Ahmad, T., Alvi, A., & Ittefaq, M. (2019). The Use of Social Media on Political Participation Among University Students: An Analysis of Survey Results From Rural Pakistan. SAGE Open, 9(3), 215824401986448.
- Zaeem Yasin, A. B. (2022). Role of Social Media in Democratization in Pakistan: An Analysis of Political Awareness, Efficacy and Participation in Youth. International Review of Social Sciences, 144- 166.
Cite this article
-
APA : Khan, M. Q., Shahzad, A., & Altaf, F. (2023). Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI(II), 324-333. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).23
-
CHICAGO : Khan, Muhammad Qasim, Areej Shahzad, and Fakhra Altaf. 2023. "Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness." Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI (II): 324-333 doi: 10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).23
-
HARVARD : KHAN, M. Q., SHAHZAD, A. & ALTAF, F. 2023. Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI, 324-333.
-
MHRA : Khan, Muhammad Qasim, Areej Shahzad, and Fakhra Altaf. 2023. "Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness." Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI: 324-333
-
MLA : Khan, Muhammad Qasim, Areej Shahzad, and Fakhra Altaf. "Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness." Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI.II (2023): 324-333 Print.
-
OXFORD : Khan, Muhammad Qasim, Shahzad, Areej, and Altaf, Fakhra (2023), "Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness", Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI (II), 324-333
-
TURABIAN : Khan, Muhammad Qasim, Areej Shahzad, and Fakhra Altaf. "Counter-Narratives and Activism: Social Media's Role in Shaping Political Awareness." Global Digital & Print Media Review VI, no. II (2023): 324-333. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).23